1 2025:CGHC:41081-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 383 of 2018 1. Aadil Ahmed Khan S/o S/o Shri Abrar Ahmed Khan, Aged About 40 Years Occupation- Kastakar, R/o Village Okhar, Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. Present Address H. N. O. 16-2-741/d/12, Behind Sham Hotel, T. V. Tower Malakpet, Hyderabad (Andhra Pradesh. .............Plaintiffs., District : Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh 2. Faizul Rasul Khan @ Fazal Rasul Khan S/o S/o Shri Abrar Ahmed Khan Aged About 42 Years R/o H. N. O. 16-2-741/59/12, Behind Sham Hotel, T. V. Tower Malakpet, Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh., District : Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh 3. Abrar Ahmed Khan S/o S/o Late Shri Murtaja Ali Khan Nagad Aged About 82 Years R/o H. N. O. 16-2-741/59/12, Behind Sham Hotel, T. V. Tower Malakpet, Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh., District : Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh ... Appellants versus 1. Abdul Sattar Khan S/o S/o Late Shri Sahadat Khan @ Shaiyad Aadat, Aged About 72 Years R/o Village- Sargaon, Hakim Nagar Near Kirana Dukan, Post Office Sargaon, Tahsil Mungeli, District Bilaspur, Now Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. .............Defendants., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 2. Smt. Anjani Kaushik W/o W/o Shri Basant Kaushik Aged About 54 Years R/o Parsada, Near Anand Chowk, Post Officer Tifra, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Collector Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4. Hiraram Patel S/o S/o Late Shri Ramdhin Patel Aged About 68 Years R/o Village Jondhara, Police Station Masturi, Tahsil Masturi (Wrongly Mentioned As Mungeli In The Impugned Judgment Dated 31-03-2018 ) District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents DEEPTI JHA NIRALA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA NIRALA 2 (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Appellants : Ms. Laxmeen Kashyap, counsel appears on behalf of Mr. Rishi Rahul Soni, Advocate. For State/Respondent No.3 : Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal & Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Order On Board 14/08/2025 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant submits that she has no instructions on behalf of appellants in the present case. 2. In view of above submission made by the counsel for appellants, this Court is left with no other option, but to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge Judge