ANNEPU RANJIT KUMAR v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CRLP/196/2025 · 2025-01-09
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2475 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2475 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010002692025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 196/2025 Between: Annepu Ranjit Kumar and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1. KALEPU YASHWANTH Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The instant Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, by the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to2, seeking quashment of the proceedings in F.I.R.No.150 of 2024, on the file of Garividi Police Station, Vizianagaram, against them for the offences punishable under Section 420 r/w 34 IPC, 156(3) IPC.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that petition may be
disposed of by giving protection to the petitioner vide guidelines of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar1.
4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on instructions, would submit that the offence registered against the petitioners is punishable with less than seven years period of imprisonment and necessary direction may be given to the concerned Station House Officer.
5. Considering the submissions, this criminal petition is disposed of with the following; a. Investigating Officer is at liberty to complete the investigation, in accordance with law. b. In the event of any coercive action sought to be taken against the petitioners, concerned police authorities are directed to scrupulously follow the procedure prescribed under Section 35 (3) of BNSS [Section 41-A Cr.P.C.,] and the guidelines laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar’s case (supra).
6. It goes without saying that, if any charge sheet is filed in the above crime, the petitioners are at liberty to challenge the charge sheet, if they feel aggrieved by the same.
7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.
1 (2014) 8 SCC 273
Pending applications, if any, shall stands closed.
_________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 09.01.2025 MH
78 HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Crl.P.No.196 of 2025
Dt.09.01.2025
MH