Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010234262025 2025:GAU-AS:16525 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2566/2025 SHRI NITUMANI KALITA SON OF SHRI DIPAK KALITA RESIDENT OF BARHARDIA, P.S. HAJO IN THE DISTRICT OF KAMRUP ASSAM- 781102 VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY P.P., ASSAM 2:PARIKSHIT KALITA SON OF SHIB RAM KALITA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARHARDIA PO KHETRI HARDI PS HAJO KAMRUP ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : KAUSHIK JAIN, MS. R HUSSAIN,MS. NITUMA KAKATI,M DEKA,P UPADHAYA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER 02.12.2025 Heard Ms. N. kakati, learned counsel appearing for the accused applicant. Also heard Mr. K. K. Das, learned Addl. PP for the State of Assam and Mr. S. Das, learned Amicus Curiae appearing for respondent Page No.# 2/3 No. 2. 2. This is an application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 praying for grant of pre-arrest bail to the accused applicant in connection with Hajo P.S. Case No. 0391/2025 registered under Sections 47/ 115/(2) / 296/78 /75 /351(3) of BNS read with Section 12 of POCSO Act, 2012. 3. This case has arisen out of an FIR filed on 16.09.2025 by the complainant alleging that the accused applicant entered to a School, wherein his minor daughter was studying and proposed her to be in a love relationship but when she denied the above proposal, the accused applicant slapped her and abused her and on receipt of the FIR, Hajoi P.S. Case No. 0391/2025 registered under Sections 47/ 115/(2) /296/78 /75 / 351(3) of BNS read with Section 12 of POCSO Act, 2012 was registered against the accused applicant. 4. Vide order dated 30.10.2025, a coordinate bench of this Court has already granted interim pre-arrest bail to the accused applicant. 5. The learned counsel appearing for the accused applicant submits that in terms of the order dated 30.10.2025, the accused applicant had appeared before the I.O. of the case and got his statement recorded. 6. In view of the aforesaid, the learned counsel appearing for the accused applicant submits that in future the accused applicant shall cooperate with the investigation and therefore, prays that the interim pre- arrest bail granted vide order dated 30.10.2025 should be made absolute. 7. Taking into account the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the considered opinion that the interim pre-arrest granted vide order dated Page No.# 3/3 30.10.2025 should be made absolute. 8. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is disposed of by making the interim pre-arrest bail granted vide order dated 30.10.2025 absolute in the same terms and conditions. In view of the aforesaid directions, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of as allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant