Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010145782025 2025:GAU-AS:15676 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3850/2025 UTPAL BARMAN S/O RAJEN BARMAN, R/O VILL- KHATARUPIABATHAN, P.O.- CHAMATA, P.S.- CHAMATA, DIST- NALBARI, PIN-781306, ASSAM VERSUS ASSAM ELECTRICITY GRID CORPORATION LIMITED AND 5 ORS. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN HAVING ITS OFFICE AT BIJULEE BHAWAN, PALTANBAZAR, GUWAHATI-01 2:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR ASSAM ELECTRICITY GRID CORPORATION LIMITED HAVING ITS OFFICE AT BIJULEE BHAWAN PALTANBAZAR GUWAHATI-01 3:CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (F AND A) ASSAM ELECTRICITY GRID CORPORATION LIMITED HAVING ITS OFFICE AT BIJULEE BHAWAN PALTANBAZAR GUWAHATI-01 4:THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER LA T AND T CIRCLE AEGCL NARENGI GUWAHATI-26 5:THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER 220 KV GRID SUB-STATION AEGCL SARUSAJAI Page No.# 2/3 GUWAHATI-34 6:THE GENERAL MANAGER (HR) ASSAM ELECTRICITY GRID CORPORATION LIMITED HAVING ITS OFFICE AT BIJULEE BHAWAN PALTANBAZAR GUWAHATI-0 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M HANDIQUE, K K DAS,MR N AHMED,MS P BORA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, AEGCL, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER 19.11.2025 Mr. S. Kotoki, learned Standing Counsel, AEGCL on instructions has submitted that the authorities had vide an office order dated 14.10.2025 reduced the probation period of the petitioner from 2(two) years to 1(one) year in terms of the earlier office order dated 26.05.2022. The reduction in the period of probation of the petitioner, also having mandating release of financial benefits to the petitioner in the authorised scale of pay, the arrears receivable by the petitioner was also computed and the amount so computed came to be released to the petitioner in his bank account. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the said position. In view of the said developments taking place in the matter, the reliefs claimed for in the present writ petition is seen to have been already granted to the petitioner herein. Page No.# 3/3 Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant