BACHAN SINGH AND OTHERS v. RAKESH KANWAR AND ANOTHER
CMP/21438/2025 · 2025-10-09
Sandeep Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24742 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24742 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Bachan Singh & Ors. V. Rakesh Kanwar & Ors. CMP No.21438 of 2024 in COPC No.931 of 2024 09.10.2025 Present: Mr. Munish Dhatwalia, Advocate, for the applicants/petitioners. Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the non-applicants/respondents-State. While placing on record communication dated 08.10.2025, issued under the signatures of Director of School Education, Himachal Pradesh, enclosing therewith copy of office
order dated August, 2025, Mr. Ravi Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, states that mandate contained in the
judgment, alleged to have been violated, stands duly complied with. Having carefully perused aforesaid documents, which are taken on record, this Court finds that in compliance of order dated 28.05.2024 passed in CWP No.8200 of 2021, titled as Bachan Singh & Ors. Vs. State of HP & others, petitioners, who were appointed on contract basis, have been considered as regular employees of the State in the pay scale of Rs.10,300/- + 34,800+4200/- Grade pay + allowances as admissible from time to time from the date, when they were initially appointed/joined on contract basis with all consequential benefits, vide order dated 10.09.2025.
In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are disposed of. However, this Court hopes and trusts that consequential benefits flowing from the aforesaid compliance shall be released to the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within four months from today. October 09, 2025
(Sandeep Sharma),
(sunil) Judge