Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010210602025 2025:GAU-AS:16817 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5462/2025 DIPU KUMARI AND 3 ORS. CATEGORY- ORTHOPAEDICALLY HANDICAPPED D/O MUKHTAR DAS,R/O WARD NO. 02, BAGAN ROAD, BONGAIGAON P.O.BONGAIGAON P.S.BONGAIGAON DIST. BONGAIGAON, ASSAM PIN- 783380 TET ROLL NO. 600002 2: ANKITA BASAK CATEGORY- OBC D/O ANIL BASAK R/O VIVEKANANDA ROAD WARDNO. 03 DHUBRI P.O. DHUBRI P.S. DHUBRI DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN-783301 TET ROLL NO. 603338. 3: SUMAN KUMARI SAH D/O RAM NANDAN SAH R/O WARD NO. 04 SUBHASH ROAD BONGAIGAO P.O. BONGAIGAON P.S. BONGAIGAON DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 PIN-783380 TET ROLL NO. 604403. 4: GIRIDHAR SHARMA SON OF KRISHNA PRASAD SHARMA R/O VILLAGE- RONGSALI SONARI P.O. JANATA P.S. BEHALI DIST. BISWANATH ASSAM PIN-784179 TET ROLL NO. 90179 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT (SECONDARY), DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006. 2:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM EDUCATION DEPARTMENT (SECONDARY) DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006 3:THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-781019. 4:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS BONGAIGAON DISTRICT CIRCLE DIST-BONGAIGAON ASSAM. 5:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS NAGOAN DISTRICT CIRCLE DIST- NAGAON ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N N B CHOUDHURY, MR. K KASHYAP Advocate for the Respondent : SC, SEC. EDU., Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 05-12-2025 Heard Mr. N. N. B. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. B. Musahary, learned Standing Counsel, Secondary Education for the respondents. Mr. Choudhury, learned counsel by placing the order dated 19.11.2025 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Appeal No. 273/2025, whereby, a similar issue involving same facts and law, in which the learned Single Judge had dismissed the writ petition, has been upheld by dismissing the appeal of the similarly situated petitioner, fairly submits that in view of the order of the Division Bench, the issue may no longer be survived for consideration by this Court. Considering that a similar matter has been considered and disposed of by the Division Bench vide order dated 19.11.2025, whereby the grievance of the same nature in this proceedings, which was dismissed by the Coordinate Bench, has been upheld, it would not be permissible to consider the issue which has already been settled by the Division Bench. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant