2025:JHHC:15032 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.4003 of 2024 ------ Nagendra Ray @ Rai, son of late Sudan Ray, resident of village Kolmurna, PO Katras Bazar, PS Katras, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand. 2.Dhirendra Nath Roy @ Dhirendra Nath Singh, son of late Rohan Roy @ Rohan Singh, resident of village Behrakudar, PO Jhagrahi, PS Barora (Baghmara), District Dhanbad, Jharkhand … … Opposite Party(s) With A.B.A. No.5854 of 2024 ------ Raghunath Ray @ Rai, son of late Sudan Ray, resident of village Kolmurna, PO Katrasgarh, PS Katras, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand. 2.Dhirendra Nath Roy @ Dhirendra Nath Singh, son of late Rohan Roy @ Rohan Singh, resident of village Behrakudar, PO Jhagrahi, PS Barora (Baghmara), District Dhanbad, Jharkhand … … Opposite Party(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prabhas Chandra Jha, Advocate. For the State : Ms. Amrita Kumari, A.P.P. Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, APP For the OP No. 2 : Mr. Kanishka Deo, Advocate ----- 10/ 11.06.2025 Heard the parties. 2. These anticipatory bail applications under Section 438 and 440 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 482 and 484 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, have been preferred by the petitioners apprehending their arrest for offences registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B, 452, 323, 341, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial 2025:JHHC:15032 2 Magistrate at Dhanbad in connection with Katras PS Case No. 415 of 2023. 3. Learned A.P.P. representing the State opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. 4. The allegation against these petitioners is that they created forged documents and impersonated themselves and sold the land of the complainant by forging the documents. 5. Further the petitioner in ABA No. 5854 of 2024 is the identifier who had admittedly identified the imposter as the actual seller. 6. Considering the nature of the allegation, this Court finds it not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to these petitioners. 7. Accordingly, these Anticipatory Bail Applications stand dismissed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Tanuj/Cp-3