W.P.No.5023 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 14.02.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD W.P.No.5023 of 2025 S.Ravi ... Petitioner vs. 1. The Inspector of Police, TIW Avadi Police Station, Poonamallee, Chennai 56. 2. The Licensing Authority cum- Regional Transport Officer, Poonamallee, Chennai 71. .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to return the original driving license (DL No.TN21 19860000198) to the petitioner forthwith. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Hariharan For R1 : Mr.V.Meganathan Govt.Advocate(Crl.side) For R2 : M/s.R.L.Karthika Govt.Advocate. ____________ Page No.1 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5023 of 2025 ORDER By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up and disposed of at the admission stage itself. 2. The present writ petition has been filed to issue a writ of mandamus directing the second respondent to return the original driving license (DL No.TN21 19860000198) to the petitioner forthwith. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that he is a Driver in the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation. On 23.12.2024, when the petitioner was driving the vehicle, a fatal accident occurred. Pursuant to the same, an FIR was registered in Crime.No.804 of 2024 for offence under Sections 106 (1) & 281 of BNS Act, It is brought to the notice of this Court that the investigation is pending. The first respondent police after registration of the FIR collected the original driving license from the petitioner and it was sent to the second respondent, who is said to have recommended for the cancellation of the driving license. Thereafter, the petitioner has ____________ Page No.2 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5023 of 2025 given a representation to the respondents requesting for returning back the original driving license. Since the same was not considered, the present writ petition has been filed before this Court. 4. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and also perused the materials available on records. 5. The issue involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the earlier order passed by this Court in W.P.No.21843 of 2021 dated 06.10.2021. The relevant portions in the order are extracted hereunder:- 4. The issue involved in the present writ petition is covered by the earlier order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD) No.8792 of 2021 dated 29.04.2021. The relevant portions of the order are extracted hereunder:- “ 6.The issue that is involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the earlier orders passed by this Court, wherein, this Court has consistently taken the view that, without passing orders under Section 19(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, the original driving licence cannot be permanently impounded. It will be useful to extract one such order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD).No.3527 of 2020, dated 21.02.2020. ____________ Page No.3 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5023 of 2025 “7.It is settled law that until the licence or any certificate issued by the competent authority is cancelled or suspended or revoked in the manner known to law, it is deemed to be in force. The impounding of licence will come only after passing of the order as per the relevant provisions of the statute, in this case, under Section 19 of the Motor Vehicles, Act, 1988. 8. In similar circumstances, a Division Bench of this Court, in P.Sethuram v. The Licensing Authority, The Regional Transport Officer, Dindigul, reported in 201 Writ L.R.100, held that even before passing the order under Section 19 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, if driving licence is impounded, it amounts to pre~determination of the issue and the authority has no jurisdiction to do so. 9. I do also respectfully agree with the views of the Division Bench of this Court and in the instant case, the respondents have no power to impound the driving licence of the petitioner and retain it with him. The petitioner is a driver and he is entitled to use the licence till it is legally cancelled or suspended. 10.In such circumstances, a direction is issued to the first respondent. The Regional Transport Officer, Trichy District, to return the original driving licence bearing D.L.No.TN5019920000594 to the ____________ Page No.4 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5023 of 2025 petitioner forthwith, on receipt of a copy of this order.” 5. In view of the above, there shall be a direction to the first respondent to return the original Driving Licence No. TN2819950002495 to the petitioner forthwith on receipt of a copy of this order. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 6. In view of the above, the second respondent is directed to return back the original driving license bearing D.L.No.TN21 19860000198 to the petitioner forthwith on receipt of a copy of this order. 7. This writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. 14.02.2025 Index : Yes/No. Internet : Yes/No. Neutral Citation : Yes/No Speaking : Non-speaking Order kkd Note : Issue Order Copy on 19.02.2025 ____________ Page No.5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5023 of 2025 J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J. kkd To 1. The Inspector of Police, TIW Avadi Police Station, Poonamallee, Chennai 56. 2. The Licensing Authority cum- Regional Transport Officer, Poonamallee, Chennai 71. W.P.No.5023 of 2025 14.02.2025 ____________ Page No.6 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis