IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Criminal Revision No.640 of 2025 Date of Decision: 26.02.2026 _______________________________________________________ Navneet …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh … Respondent _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1. For the Petitioner: Mr. N.K. Bhalla, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise all issues as have been raised in the instant petition at the time of framing of charge. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, learned Court below, while framing charge on the basis of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C as well as documents annexed therewith, shall not be influenced by its earlier order dated 06.08.2025 passed on the 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 application under Section 250 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita filed at the behest of the petitioner-accused. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge February 26, 2026 (sunil)