[2025:RJ-JP:28198] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 3rd Bail Application No. 9141/2025 Sachin S/o Rakesh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ehan (Ahan), P.S. Hathras Junction, District Hathras. (Uttar Pradesh) (At Presently Confined In Sawaimadhopur Jail) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Goyal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 28/07/2025 1. The instant 3rd bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused- petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.82/2025, registered at Police Station Mantown, District Sawai Madhopur, for the offence(s) under Sections 305(A) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the first bail application of the petitioner was dismissed as not pressed and thereafter, the Police has submitted the charge-sheet against the petitioner. The petitioner is behind the bars since 02.03.2025, for alleged offence under Sections 331(4) and 305(1) of BNS. It is further contended that the other similarly placed co-accused has already been enlarged on bail, offences alleged against the petitioner are triable [2025:RJ-JP:28198] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9141/2025] by Magistrate and further trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the third bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of third bail application. It is contended that the petitioner is having criminal antecedents and against him 8 FIRs have been registered under various offences, out of which mostly relates to the offence of theft, the petitioner belongs to Uttar Pradesh and if the petitioner’s bail application is allowed than there exist reasonable apprehension of the petitioner will not appear before the concerned trial Court, therefore, the third bail application of the petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case, considering the long incarceration of the petitioner, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the third bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner, Sachin S/o Rakesh, in connection with FIR No.82/2025, registered at Police Station Mantown, District Sawai Madhopur, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned [2025:RJ-JP:28198] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9141/2025] Police Station. The S.H.O. of the concerned Police Station shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner to the trial Court, every month. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-9