SWAMI SUKHABODHANANDA SARASWATI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
CCC/114/2025 · 2026-08-24
C M Joshi
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2472 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2472 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34891-DB CCC No. 114 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 114 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
SWAMI SUKHABODHANANDA SARASWATI, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O LATE CMS MOORTHY, R/AT NO.1, NIRGUNA MANDIR LAYOUT, ST BED AREA, 1ST BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 047.
DULY REP. BY SPA HOLDER, MR. JITENDER V. JOSHI, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O MR. VISHNUDAS JOSHI. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI JAGADISHCHANDRA KAMATH.K, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF SURVEY SETTLEMENT, LAND RECORDS, SSLR BUILDING, K.R CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560 001.
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2.
SRI N.S. SACHIN, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, BENGALURU SOUTH, K R CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560 001.
3.
SRI K.NAGRAJ, THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK,
Digitally signed by NANDINI R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34891-DB CCC No. 114 of 2025
BENGALURU-560 009. …ACCUSED (BY SRI NAVEEN CHANDRASHEKAR, AGA)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THE HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED NO.2 AND 3 FOR GROSS DISOBEDIENCE OF THE
ORDER DATED 25.04.2024 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP NO.9175/2024 (KLR-RES).
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)
1. The complainant has filed the present complaint alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 25.04.2024 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.9175/2024 [KLR-RES].
2. In terms of the said order, this Court had directed the Assistant Director of Land Records, Bengaluru South Taluk and the Special Tahsildar, Bengaluru South Taluk, to carry out the phodi and durast in terms of the online application filed by the complainant on 21.11.2022, which is Annexed as Annexure-D1 to the said writ petition.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34891-DB CCC No. 114 of 2025
3. The said directions, admittedly, were not complied with.
4. The learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the accused submits that said exercise was not conducted in view of a letter issued by the complainant for not carrying out the said exercise and now the complainant claims that the said letter was not issued by him and it does not bears his signature. Taking note of the same, the accused has filed a criminal complaint.
5. Not withstanding the same, learned Additional Government Advocate submits that the order passed by this Court would be complied with within a period of four (4) weeks from the date.
6. In view of the said statement, the present complaint is closed with liberty to the complainant to revive the same, if the statement made today is not adhered to.
Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE
tsn* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 68