lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARA WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA R CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7232 OF 2025 Between : Chinna Narasimhulu Alias Gurijala Narasimhulu, S/o G.Narasimhulu alias Pedda Narasimhulu, Aged about 36 years, R/o, D/No.7/361-10, Bhagya Nagar, Kadapa Town, Kadapa District. ..|Petitioner/Accused All AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep By its Public Prosecutor, A.P. High Court Building, Amaravathi ...Respondent/Complal-nant Petition under Section 480 & 483 of BNSS (old SectI-OnS 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C), praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be Pleased tO enlarge the Petitioners On bail, Pending Trial in Cr.No.114/2025, on the file of Dharmavaram ll Town P.S in the interests of justice. Counsel forthe Petitioner : Sri N Ranga Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : Ms.P.Akhila Naidu, Assistant Public Prosecutor. The Court made the following ORDER: ++Ll..I-.'',,±l...I..'l'.:1i;IlI a aI a- 10349042025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original JurisdI-CtiOn) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT [3521] THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7232/2025 Between: CHINNA NARASIMHULU ALIAS GURIJALA NARASIMHULU, S/O G. NARASIMHULU ALIAS PEDDA NARASIMHULU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O, D/NO.7/361-10, BHAGYA NAGAR, KADAPA TOWN, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep By its Public Prosecutor, A.P. High Court Building, Amaravathi ".RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528-of BNSS praying that ih the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of GroLlnds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to order to enlarge the petitioners on bail, pending Trial in Cr.No,114/2025, on the file of Dharmavaram II Town P.S in the interests of justice and pass Counsel for the petitioner/accused: N RANGA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following ORDER: The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the BharatI'ya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity {the BNSS]), seeking to 2 Dr.YLR,J CRL.P. Nb.7232/2025 enlarge the petitioner/Accused No.1 on bail in Cr.No.114 of 2025 of Dharmavaram ll Town Police Station, Sri Sathya Sai District, registered against the petitioner/Accused No.1 hereI'n for the Offence Punishable under section 85, 108 read with 3 (5) of Bharatl'ya Nyaya Sanhita (for brevI'ty lthe BNS])- 2. The case of the prosecution is that the deceased, Tadimarri Bhagya, daughter of the de-facto complainant, was married to Accused No.1, and they had two children. After two years of marriage, Accused Nos.1 to 3 allegedly harassed her, used abusI-Ve language, and demanded additional dowry and divorce. The deceased returned to her parental home, stayed there for 20 b cands days, and expressed to her mother that she preferred(suicide over continued harassment. She later dl-ed by hanging herself from an iron hook at her ParentS' house. She was taken to the Area Hospital, where she was declared brought dead.. Hence, a case was registered. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. perused the record. 4. SrI' N. Ranga Reddy, the learned counsel forthe petitionersubmits that the petitioner has not committed any offence; petitioner was falsely implicated by the police in the crim`e; petitioner is the sole breadwinner; petitioner would abide by any conditions to be imposed by this court; and urged to allow the petition. --'-'-±± i= Dr.YLRIJ CRL. P. No.7232/2025 5. Per confra, Ms. P. AkhI|la Naidu, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, opposed in granting of bail, stating that some more material wI'tneSSeS have tO be examined; investigatI-On iS not completed; I-f the Petitioner iS enlarged on bail,. he would not be available for the investigation and he would escape from the clutches of law,I and urged to dismiss the bail petition. 6. As seen from the record, the allegation against the petitioner/Accused No.1 is that he abetted his wife/de;eased to take extreme step of putting an end to her life. The petitioner is working as Government Lecturer of polytechnic college. A Memo has been filed appending with call details of the mobI'Ie number of the deceased from Jio Digital Life, wherein on several occasions, quite long time, the deceased has been hours together talking with One constable Who reSI-deS near tO her house. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that Tadimarri Bhagya (deceased) maintained an external marital relationship with the said constable. Learned counsel while drawing the attention of this court to the call data records, submits that the petitl'oner was not a dutiful wI'fe, She herself created chaos in the family and went away from the company of the petitioner 20 days prior to her suicide. Tadimarri Bhagya (deceased) ended her Iife by hangI'ng herself in the house of her parents, but not in the house of the Petitioner. An agreem.ent was entered in between the petitioner and the Parents Of the deceased On 03.06.2025 wherein several arrangements were affected. The pet`iii9ner and deceased were blessed with two children who are I-- i 4 Dr.YLRIJ CRL.P.No.7232/2025 aged about 7 and 9 years respectively and they are in the custody of the petitioner. The petitioner was arrested on o3.06.2025, ever since he has been in the judicial custody for the past 50 days. 8. ln view of the above, considering the nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the petitI'Oner, and his alleged role-in the case, the fact that two children of the petitioner and deceased are with the petl'tioner and the period of detention undergone by the petitioner in judicial custody, this court deems it` fit to enlarge the petitioner on bail with the following stringent conditions: i.`The petitioner/Accused No.1 shall be enlarged on bail subject to he executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only), with two sureties each for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned IV Additional Sessions Judge-Cum-Special Judge for Trial of Offences Against Women, Ananthapuramu. ii. The petitioner/Accused No.1 shall appear before the Station House Officer, Dharmavaram ll Town Police Station, Sri Sathya Sai District, on every Saturday in between 10:00 am and 05:00 pm, till cognizance is taken by the learned the Trial Court. iii. The petitioner/Accused No.1 shall not leave the limits of the District without prior permission from the learned lv Additional Sessions Judge-Gum-Special Judge for Trial of Offences Against Women, Ananthapuramu. REasfgap / 5 Dr.YLR,J CRL.P.No.7232/2025 iv. The petitioner/Accused No.1 shall not commI't Or indulge in commission of any offence in future. v. The petitioner/Accused No.1 shall cooperate with the investigatI'ng Officer in further investigation of the case and shall make himself available for interrogation by the I-nVeStigating officer as and when requl'red. vi. The petitioner/Accused No.1shaII not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police offI'Cer. vii. The petitioner/Accused No.1 shall surrender his passport, l'f any, to the investigating officer. If he claims that he does not have a passport, he shall submit an affidavit to that effect to the Investigating Officer. 9. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. //TRUE COPY// I Forl Sd/- K.TATA RAO SECTION OFFICER To'1 The lV Addlt`Onal SesSIOnS Judge-Gum-Speclal Judge for Trlal Of OffenCeS Lt=l+=t -vi9T,e.n_, _±^n+,ann+tan =fP uF:TaS¥%' 2. The Jud-,cial Magistrate Of First Class, DharmaVaram. 3. The Superlntendent, Sub-Jall, DharmaVaram, Sn Satya Sal DistrlCt 4 The StatlOn House Offlcer, DharmaVaram " Town PollCe StatlOn, Sn Satya 5. One CC to Sri N Ranga Reddy, Advocate [OPUCI sa'l D-lstriCt. 6 Two CCs to PubllC ProseClltOr, Hlgh Court Of Andhra PradeSh [OUTl 7. OneSPare COPY u>U1 |^ |j. I- HIGH COURT Dr.YLR,J DATED : 23/07/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.7232 of 2025 ALLOWED