2025:JHHC:30524 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5769 of 2025 1. Lalan Ram @ Lalan Mochi, aged about 55 years, Son of Late Kalpu Ram, 2. Bindu Ram @ Bindu Mochi, aged about 40 years, Son of Late Kalpu Ram, 3. Vijay Ram @ Vijay Mochi, aged about 53 years, Son of Late Kalpu Ram 4. Seema Kumari, aged about 18 years, D/o Lalan Ram 5. Sangeeta Devi, aged about 50 years, W/o Vijay Ram, 6. Poonam Kumari @ Hirmaniya Kumari @ Hirmaniya, aged about 23 years, D/o Bindu Ram, All are resident of Village- Kajru Kala, P.O. and P.S.- Pandu, District- Palamau, Jharkhand. … Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioners : Mrs. Juhi Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anup Pawan Topno, A.P.P. ----- 02/26.09.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Pandu P.S. Case No.84 of 2024, registered for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 117(2), 126(2), 109, 132 of the BNS, pending in the Court of the learned J.M., Palamu. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the false allegations are made against the petitioners to the effect as Nazir of the Civil Courts has gone to execute the decree passed in the Execution Case No. 06/2015. It is alleged that Petitioners along with 50 unknown persons tried to make assault upon him. She submits that there is general and omnibus allegations against the petitioners. She then submits that petitioners are named in the FIR. She also submits that in the same incident two FIR has 2025:JHHC:30524 2 been registered and, in another FIR with regard the same allegations, 08 of the accused persons has been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 5285 of 2025 and in A.B.A. No. 5282 of 2025. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are made of altercation between Nazir and the petitioners. 5. Considering that there are general and omnibus allegations against the petitioners and in the other FIR, for the same allegations, 08 of the accused persons has been granted anticipatory bail and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner are directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M., Palamu in connection Pandu P.S. Case No.84 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 26th September, 2025 Simran/