Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24709 (RAJ)

ASHWANI KUMAR SHARMA SON OF LATE SHRI BANSHIDHAR VYAS v. KAILASH CHAND SONI SON OF SHRI NANAGRAM SONI

CW/11271/2025 · 2025-09-03

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:35224] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11271/2025 Ashwani Kumar Sharma Son Of Late Shri Banshidhar Vyas, Aged About 69 Years, Resident Of House Number 277, Mehandi Ka Chowk, Vyason Ki Gali, Maniram Ji Ki Kothi, Ramganj Bazar, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. Kailash Chand Soni Son Of Shri Nanagram Soni, Resident Of House No. 3682, Phuta Khurra, Chowkdi Ramchandraji, Jaipur, Current Tenant- M/s Shubhlakshmi Jewellers, Shop East And South Facing Corner House No. 289, Maniramji Ki Kothi Ka Rasta, Chowkdi Ghat Gate, Ramganj Bazar, Jaipur. (Died During Trial) 2/1. 2/2. Kamal Soni Son Of Late Kailash Chand Soni, Resident Of Plot No. 74, Krishna Nagar-Ii, Agra Road, Jaipur, Presently Tenant Of M/s Shubhlakshmi Jewellers, One Shop, East And South Facing Corner, House No. 289, Maniramji Ki Kothi, Ramganj Bazar, Chowkdi Ghat Darwaza, Jaipur. Vimal Soni Son Of Late Kailash Chand Soni Resident Of Plot No. 74, Krishna Nagar-Ii, Agra Road, Jaipur, Presently Tenant Of M/s Shubhlakshmi Jewellers, One Shop, East And South Facing Corner, House No. 289, Maniramji Ki Kothi, Ramganj Bazar, Chowkdi Ghat Darwaza, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harsh Pratap Singh Mr. Umesh Kumar Sharma JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 03/09/2025 1. A limited prayer has been made by the counsel for the petitioner for issuing directions to the Rent Tribunal No.2, Jaipur Metropolitan-I to decide the Case No.528/2018 expeditiously as early as possible within a time frame. [2025:RJ-JP:35224] (2 of 2) [CW-11271/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case is pending before the Tribunal for adjudication since 2018 and more than seven years have passed and the petitioner is a senior citizen of the age of 69 years, so appropriate directions be issued to the Tribunal to decide the suit expeditiously. 3. The prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner appears to be genuine. 4. The instant writ petition stands disposed of with directions to the Rent Tribunal No.2, Jaipur Metropolitan-I to decide the Case No.528/2018 expeditiously as early as possible preferably within a period of two years from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 5. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/85