[2025:RJ-JP:33292] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10945/2025 Renu Sharma D/o Shri Mukesh Kumar Sharma, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Flat No. 304, G-92, Kardhani Scheme, Kalwar Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur. At Present Working As Ntt In M.g. Government Sr. Secondary School, Paduna, Tehsil Girwa, District Udaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Director, Woman And Child Development Department, 2, Jal Path, Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur 2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, State Agriculture Management Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur 3. Deputy Director (Administration), Integrated Child Development Services (Woman And Child Development Department), 2, Jal Path, Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur 4. District Education Officer (H.q.), Secondary Education, Udaipur 5. Project Officer, Woman And Child Development Department, Project Girva, Udaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Pathak For Respondent(s) : Mr. Akash Gaur, Dy.G.C. with Mr. K.C. Gupta Mr. Manish Bhardwaj for Mr. Nalin G. Narain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 22/08/2025 1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking the prayer inter alia, that the concerned respondents may be directed to issue an NOC to the petitioner for participating in the selection process for the post of Pre-Primary Education Teacher (NTT). 2. During the course of the argument, counsel for the parties were in agreement that the controversy involved in this petition has already been set at rest by the Co-ordinate Bench of this [2025:RJ-JP:33292] (2 of 3) [CW-10945/2025] Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in the case of Rajkumar vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12182/2019). Counsel submits that the instant petition be disposed of in the light of similar directions issued in the case of Rajkumar (Supra). 3. Heard and considered the submissions made at bar and perused the material available on record, as well as the order passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Rajkumar (Supra). 4. Since the controversy involved in this petition has already been set at rest in the case of Rajkumar (Supra) with the following prayers and directions:- “This Court also observes that the petitioners have submitted applications for seeking permission for allowing their appearance in the Pre Primary Education Teacher Direct Recruitment Examination- 2018 and then appeared in the written examination, whereafter on 31.07.2019, the petitioners have secured their respective roll numbers in the provisional list and we recalled for documents verification. This Court also observes that the petitioners have made due compliance of the aforementioned condition No.14 of the advertisement in question. The petitioner clearly fell under the cut off marks criteria and were accordingly, called for documents verification by the respondents, and therefore, on this count also, the impugned action of the [2025:RJ-JP:33292] (3 of 3) [CW-10945/2025] respondents in not issuing the requisite NOC in favour of the petitioners is not justified in law. This Court further observes that in the case of other similarly situated persons, the respondents allowed them to participate in the recruitment process of the year 2013 (as reflected in Annexure-3 of the lead petition), whereas, the same treatment has not been meted out to the present petitioners, which is also not permissible in law. Thus on a consideration of the overall facts and circumstances of the case, and in light of the aforesaid observations, the present petitions are allowed and while quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 08.01.2019, the respondent authorities are directed to issue the requisite NOC to the petitioners for further process in the recruitment in question, and the said NOC upon being issued shall be duly considered by the concerned respondent authorities, in pursuance of the advertisement in question. All pending applications also stand disposed of.” 5. Accordingly, the instant petition stands disposed of in the light of similar directions issued in the case of Rajkumar(Supra). 6. Stay application as well as all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /8