AKASH WOMEN SELF HELF GROUP, PELGI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPC/2817/2022 · 2025-05-02
Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24706 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24706 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:20310
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2817 of 2022 Akash Women Self Helf Group, Palgi Through President Smt. Sunita W/o Pradeep Yadav Aged About 28 Years, President Of Akash Women Self Help Group - Paldi R/o Village Palgi Block Ramchandrapur District Balrampur- Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Food And Civil Supply Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur- District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Collector Balrampur District Balrampur - Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Ramanujganj District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Block Education Officer Ramchandrapur District Balrampur- Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. 5 - President, Of Suman Women Self Help Group Palgi Block - Ramchandrapur, District Balrampur - Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : None For Respondent-State : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.5 : Mr. Shikhar Agnihotri, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.05.03 17:06:43 +0530
2 Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 02.05.2025
1. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition when the case is called out.
2. Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State/respondents No.1 to 4 and Mr. Shikhar Agnihotri, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Awadh Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent No.5, are present.
3. Today, when the case is called, learned counsel for the petitioner is not present nor any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition on repeated calls and it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the matter.
4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/- Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge Yogesh