Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24698 (PAT)

Dhirendra Sao v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./16353/2025 · 2025-04-02

Sandeep Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16353 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2024 Thana- RISIYAP District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Dhirendra Sao S/o- Balitar Sao Village- Khetpura PS-Risiup District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Birendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nirmala Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 02-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Risiup P.S. Case No. 22 of 2024, registered for the alleged offence under Sections 147, 149, 323, 307, 353, 332, 336, 337, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per prosecution case, during immersion of idol of Goddess Saraswati, the informant prevailed upon the processionists to immerse the idol at certain place in a canal. Aggrieved by the act of the informant, the petitioners and a number of the other co-accused persons surrounded the police party and abused and assaulted them. The chowkidar disclosed the name of the petitioners along with 17 other named co- accused persons apart from 15 unknown persons. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16353 of 2025(2) dt.02-04-2025 2/3 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence at the alleged time and date. The petitioner never prevented the police party in discharging its duties. The petitioner claims to have clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the clean antecedent of the petitioner along with general and omnibus allegations without substantive material against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court concerned within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Aurangabad/concerned Court below in connection with Risiup P.S. Case No. 22 of 2024, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and other following conditions: (i) One of the bailors will be a close Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16353 of 2025(2) dt.02-04-2025 3/3 relative of the petitioner. (ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned trial court. Vikas/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U