ANKURJYOTI KATHKOTIA AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
AB/2392/2025 · 2025-11-19
Sanjeev Kumar Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24691 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24691 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010218062025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2392/2025 ANKURJYOTI KATHKOTIA AND ANR SON OF NARESHWAR KATHKOTIA RESIDENT OF VILL- JOYNAGAR, P.S. JOYNAGAR, DIST. SIVASAGAR, ASSAM 2: DHRUBAJYUOTI GOGOI SON OF LAMBODHAR GOGOI
RESIDENT OF HALOWAGAON P.S. NAZIRA DIST. SIVASAGAR ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE LEARNED PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. A BEGUM, MR. N Z AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 20.11.2025
1. Heard Mr. A.A Dewan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K.K Das, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.
2. This is the second application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners namely, 1. Dhrubajyoti Gogoi and 2. Ankurjyoti Kathkotia in connection with Badarpur P.S. Case No. 103/2025 registered under Sections 61(2)/316(2)/318(3)/318(4) of the BNS,
2023.
3. Earlier application filed by the petitioner vide AB No. 1486 of 2025 was rejected by this Court vide order dated 01.08.2025. The previous bail application was rejected by observing that a custodial interrogation of the petitioner was necessary, in as much as sufficient material was found against them in the Case Diary. Hence, it was not fit case for grant of pre-arrest bail.
4. In the instant petition, no new ground has been made out to the satisfaction of this Court. Accordingly, the instant petition also stands dismissed.
5. Case Diary to be returned back.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant