[2025:RJ-JP:27850] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10726/2025 Hi-Tech Digital Plates Private Limited, Having Its Registered Of- fice At H 186-187, Malviya Nagar, Industrial Area, Jaipur Through Its Director And Authorized Signatory Mr. Deepak Agar- wal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o 24, Pratap Nagar Colony, Near Glass Factory, Tonk Road, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. M/s Yashraj Advertisers, Through Its Proprietor Mr. Yo- gesh Kumar Sharma, Office Address- Plot No. 1, B1, Aan- chal Apartment, Opposite State Bank Of India, Sehkar Marg, Lal Kothi, Jaipur- 302015. 2. The Managing Director, Rajasthan Samwad, Department Of Information And Public Relations, Government Secre- tariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Sharma For Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : : Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG with Mr. Aaditya Godara Mr. Vedant Sharma Mr. Prateek Kasliwal through V.C. with Mr. Shubham Bhati HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 22/07/2025 Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG & Mr. Vedant Sharma, Adv. have put in appearance on behalf of respondents whereas Mr. Prateek Kasli- wal, Adv. has put in appearance through V.C. as caveator. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not impleaded as party respondent in the second appeal filed by the respondent No.1 under the provisions of Rajasthan Transparency Public Procurement Act, 2012. [2025:RJ-JP:27850] (2 of 2) [CW-10726/2025] At the outset, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 submits that order passed by the learned Second Appellate Authority may be quashed and set aside and it may be allowed to implead the petitioner as party respondent and fresh order may be passed by the learned Second Appellate Authority. Counsel submits that Appellate Authority may be directed to expedite the hearing of the second appeal. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not object the submissions of counsel for the respondent No.1. In view of above, order dated 08.07.2025 passed by learned Second Appellate Authority is quashed and set aside on following term as agreed and requested by learned counsel for the respective parties:- “The Second Appellate Authority shall decide the appeal preferred by the respondent No.1 after impleading the petitioner as party respondent afresh after affording an opportunity of hearing to all the parties within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of this order.” Parties are directed to remain present before the Second Appellate Authority on 28.07.2025. With the aforesaid directions, this civil writ petition stands disposed of. Stay application and pending application(s) (if any) stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /91