BAPURAO SANGRAM HANGARGE (DIED) THR LRS. RUKMINBAI BAPURAO HANGARGE AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, LATUR AND OTHERS
CA/1971/2024 · 2025-04-17
Shri Shailesh P Brahme
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24688 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24688 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 930(i).CA.1971-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1971 OF 2024 IN FAST/24277/2014 BAPURAO SANGRAM HANGARGE (DIED) THR LRS.
RUKMINBAI BAPURAO HANGARGE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, LATUR AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Halkude S.S. AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. S.M. Ganachari …
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 17th APRIL 2025 PER COURT : . Heard both sides.
2. This application is for condonation of delay of 87 days in setting aside abatement and bringing heirs of Applicant No.1 – Bapurao Sangram Hangarge, on record.
3. I have gone through the application and I am of the view that delay needs to be condoned. The cause of action survives against the legal heirs of the deceased – Applicant. No prejudice would be caused to the Respondents, if application is allowed. I, therefore pass following order :
ORDER (i) Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’. 2025:BHC-AUG:11394
2 930(i).CA.1971-2024.doc
(ii) Amendment be carried out within two weeks.
SHAILESH P. BRAHME JUDGE NAJEEB..