Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18899 MSA No. 65 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 65 OF 2018 (LA) BETWEEN:
1. RANGASWAMAIAH S/O LATE JADIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
2. SHIVANNA S/O LATE JADIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NANDIHALLI VILLAGE, CHELURU HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK-572 216. …APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. SHANTHARAJ K., ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER HEMAVATHI CANAL ZONE TUMAKURU-572 101 …RESPONDENT
THIS MSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 54(2) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.09.2016 PASSED IN RA[LAC] NO.83/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, TUMAKURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.02.2012 PASSED IN LAC NO.272/2006
Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18899 MSA No. 65 of 2018
ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GUBBI, PARTLY ALLOWING REFERANCE PETITION FOR ENHANCED COMPENSATION AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
ORAL JUDGMENT
This appeal is of the year 2018 and ultimately, it was dismissed vide order dated 17.09.2021. However, this Court vide order dated 12.12.2024, condoned the delay of 983 days in filing the recalling application and also recalled the order dated 17.09.2021. Inspite of the said order, till date, office objections are not complied hence, it is clear that the counsel for the appellants is not pursuing he matter diligently and thus, no purpose would be served in keeping this matter pending from 2018 to 2025 for compliance. Accordingly, this MSA is dismissed.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN