Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24686 (AP)

K RAMA DEVI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/17787/2025 · 2025-07-15

Nyapathy Vijay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010348932025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 17787/2025 Between: 1. K RAMA DEVI, W/O.RAJAGOPAL REDDY AGED 34 YEARS, OCC FIELDASSISTANT, R/O.KONAMPET VILLAGE, LAKKIREDDIPALLI MANDAL YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE PROJECT DIRECTORCUMADDITIONAL DISTRICT PROGRAMME COORDINATOR OF MGNREGS, DISTRICT WATER MAHAGENT AGENCY YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, AP ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order direction more particularly one the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2ND respondent vide proceedings Rc.No.A/404/ HR/TOC/2025 dt.26-03-2025 thereby suspending the petitioner on the allegation that she is making musters in favour of some workers as illegal, irregular, arbitrary without jurisdiction, contrary to Field Assistant Human Resources Police, 2013 violative of principles of natural justice and offends Art. 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, contrary to the provisions of National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme Act 2005 and consequently suspend the orders of the 2 respondent in A/404/HR/TOC25 dt.21-12-2024 and direct the 2d respondent to allow the petitioner to attend to her duties and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the orders of the 2ND respondent in Rc.No.A/404/HR/TOC/25 dt.26-03-2025 and direct the respondent No.2 to allow the petitioner to attend her duties pending disposal of this writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GUTTAPALEM VIJAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P.No.17787 of 2025 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 in issuing the proceedings vide Rc.No.A/404/HR/TOC/2025, dated 26.03.2025 thereby suspending the Petitioner on the allegation that she is making musters in favour of some workers as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Sri G.Vijaya Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to challenge the proceedings issued subsequent to the filing of the writ petition. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty to file fresh writ petition is accorded. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY,J Date: 16.07.2025 SCS 4 71 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 17787/2025 DATE:- 16.07.2025 SCS