IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 206 PNB Housing Finance Limited Shri Amit Haryana and others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings against the respondent 27.9.2019 CWP-30959 District Magistrate, Gurugram an disposed of on the basis of understanding/undertaking of respondents No.3 and 4 therein that “….. Bank within a period of two months counted from today and in the interregnum the B possession of the secured assets and shall also hand over the GPAs of two shops which are in their possession. At the same time, it is also made clear that in case the amount is not paid as undertaken today COCP-878-2020 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.878 of 2020 Date of decision : PNB Housing Finance Limited Versus Shri Amit Khatri, District Magistrate, District Gurugram, Haryana and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None for the petitioner. Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is proceedings against the respondents for not complying the order dated 27.9.2019 (Annexure P-2) passed by a Division 30959-2018 titled as “PNB Housing Finance Limited vs. District Magistrate, Gurugram and others” vide which the petition was disposed of on the basis of understanding/undertaking of respondents No.3 and 4 therein that “…..they would pay the entire dues of the Bank within a period of two months counted from today and in the interregnum the Bank shall not take any coercive steps for taking possession of the secured assets and shall also hand over the GPAs of two shops which are in their possession. At the same time, it is also made clear that in case the amount is not paid as undertaken today 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 878 of 2020 (O & M) Date of decision :-28.08.2025 …..Petitioner Khatri, District Magistrate, District Gurugram, …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana. Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt for not complying the order dated Division Bench of this Court in PNB Housing Finance Limited vs. d others” vide which the petition was disposed of on the basis of understanding/undertaking of respondents they would pay the entire dues of the Bank within a period of two months counted from today and in the ank shall not take any coercive steps for taking possession of the secured assets and shall also hand over the GPAs of two shops which are in their possession. At the same time, it is also made clear that in case the amount is not paid as undertaken today by VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.01 18.01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document respondents No.3 and 4, the petitioner would be at liberty to take possession of the secured assets in accordance with law and the District Magistrate, Gurugram is directed to assist the petitioner to take possession of the secured assets immediately shows that on the last date i.e. 07.11.2023 there was no representation on behalf of petitioner. Even today there is no representation on behalf of petitioner. petitioner present litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the petitioner has adopted an utterly casual and careless approach. It is clear that neither the pursuing the present matter. Thus, this Court is left with no other option except to August 28 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / COCP-878-2020 (O & M) respondents No.3 and 4, the petitioner would be at liberty to take possession of the secured assets in accordance with law and the District Magistrate, Gurugram is directed to assist the petitioner to take possession of the secured assets immediately The matter pertains to the year 2020. The order sheets shows that on the last date i.e. 07.11.2023 there was no representation on behalf of petitioner. Even today there is no representation on behalf of petitioner. A bare reading of the above facts sh petitioner has exhibited an utterly casual attitude in the pursuit of the present litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the petitioner in the interest of justice. On the other hand, the adopted an utterly casual and careless approach. It is clear that neither the petitioner nor its counsel are seriously interested in pursuing the present matter. Thus, this Court is left with no other on except to dismiss the same for non Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. 8, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 respondents No.3 and 4, the petitioner would be at liberty to take possession of the secured assets in accordance with law and the District Magistrate, Gurugram is directed to assist the petitioner to take possession of the secured assets immediately.” The matter pertains to the year 2020. The order sheets shows that on the last date i.e. 07.11.2023 there was no representation on behalf of petitioner. Even today there is no A bare reading of the above facts shows that the exhibited an utterly casual attitude in the pursuit of the present litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the justice. On the other hand, the petitioner adopted an utterly casual and careless approach. It is clear that counsel are seriously interested in pursuing the present matter. Thus, this Court is left with no other the same for non-prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.01 18.01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document