STATE OF RAJASTHAN v. DR. RAJESH KUMAR SHARMA SON OF SHRI VIDHYASAGAR SHARMA
SAW/925/2025 · 2025-09-19
Bhuwan Goyal, Inderjeet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24684 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24684 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:38529-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 925/2025 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7283/2025
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Medical And Health, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur
3. Joint Secretary, Medical And Health (Group-2), Department And Panchayati Raj (Medical Department), Secretariat, Jaipur
4. Director, Public Health, Medical And Health Department, Directorate Of Medical And Health, Jaipur ----Appellants Versus Dr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Vidhyasagar Sharma, Aged About 53 Years, Resident Of 184, Paschim Vihar Colony, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur- 302021. ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Mituka HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 19/09/2025
1. After arguing for some time, counsel for the respondent- original writ petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the original writ petition pending before the learned Single Judge with liberty to raise his grievances before the
[2025:RJ-JP:38529-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-925/2025] Departmental authorities with regard to revocation of his suspension.
2. Learned Additional Advocate General has not disputed the submission made by counsel for the original writ petitioner (respondent herein).
3. In that view of the matter, the original writ petition No.7283/2025 filed on behalf of the original writ petitioner (respondent herein) is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
4. In the event of any application being filed by the original writ petitioner raising his grievance, the authority concerned is directed to decide the same in accordance with law within a period of two weeks of such application being received.
5. The interim order dated 16.05.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge stands vacated.
6. The appeal is disposed of with the aforesaid directions/observations.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J PAYAL DHAWAN /116