( 2025:JHHC:29165 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 5364 of 2025 1. Shyam Sundar Manjhi aged about 56 years, son of late Falanand Manjhi 2. Chhabiya Devi @ Chhedi Devi, aged about 54 years, wife of Shyam Sundar Manjhi 3. Pappu Manjhi @ Pappu Kumar Manjhi, aged about 28, son of Shyam Sundar Manjhi 4. Virendra Manjhi @ Virendra Kr. Manjhi, aged about 27 years, son of Shyam Sundar Manjhi, All are residents of village Bhorabad, P.O. and P.S. Jarmundi, District- Dumka ...... … Petitioners Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Rambuttu Mandal, son of late Gyanand Mandal, resident of village- Latapakar, P.O. and P.s. Jarmundi, District-Dumka .…. … Opposite Parties -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. S.P. Roy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, A.P.P. 02/ 22.09.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Jarmundi P.S. Case No. 69 of 2025, registered under sections 80(2)/3/(5) of the BNS, 2023, pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Dumka. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1 is father-in-law, petitioner no.2 is mother-in-law and petitioner nos. 3 and 4 are brother-in-law of the deceased. He further submits that allegations are general and omnibus and there is no role of the petitioners in instigating the deceased to take such step. He further submits that the deceased was treated from Central Institute of Psychiatry, Government of India, Kanke, Ranchi. He further submits that in the case diary independent witnesses have stated that family members are innocent. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioners may kindly be provided privilege of ( 2025:JHHC:29165 ) anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegations are there and the petitioners are inlaws of the deceased. 5. Considering that petitioner no.1 is father-in-law, petitioner no.2 is mother-in-law and petitioner nos.3 and 4 are brother-in-law of the deceased and from perusal of F.I.R. it is not clear how these petitioners instigated the deceased to take such step and further the deceased was treated from Central Institute of Psychiatry, Government of India, Kanke, Ranchi 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the above named, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Dumka, in connection with Jarmundi P.S. Case No. 69 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. Dt.22.09.2025 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-