2025:HHC:31001 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.14630 of 2025 a/w connected matters Date of decision: 10.09.2025 1. CWP No.14630 of 2025 Kalpana Devi and others. ...Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. & Other. ...Respondents. 2. CWP No.14622 of 2025 Bindu Rani. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Anr. ...Respondents. 3. CWP No.14634 of 2025 Radhna. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Anr. ...Respondents. 4. CWP No.14650 of 2025 Abneesh Kamal. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Anr. ...Respondents. 5. CWP No.14652 of 2025 Vidya Devi. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Anr. ...Respondents. -2- 2025:HHC:31001 6. CWP No.14632 of 2025 Sujan Singh. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Anr. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners : Mr. Ashok Kumar Verma, Advocate in all the petitions. For the respondents : Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General in all the petitions. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matters are heard at this stage. 3. Petitioners’ grievance is that their respective representations, annexed with these writ petitions, seeking applicability of the decision rendered in Mohit Sharma and Anr. Vs. State of H.P. and Others1, have not been decided till date. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the 1CWP No. 1638 of 2024, decided on 29.11.2024. -3- 2025:HHC:31001 petitioners would be content, if the cases of the petitioners are considered by the respondents in light of the aforesaid judgment. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in the case of Mohit Sharma(1) within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at, shall also be communicated to the petitioners. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, to also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 10th September, 2025 Judge (Rupsi)