Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010019312024 2025:GAU-AS:16447 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/587/2024 LINA CHOUDHURY @ LINA CHOUDHURY RAJKHOWA W/O- JAJNESWAR RAJKHOWA, R/O- SATGAON, P.S. NOONMATI, GUWAHATI- 781027, DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM REVENUE AND DISASTER MAAGEMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KAMRUP (METRO) GUWAHATI DISTRICT- KAMRUP (METRO) ASSAM 4:THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER (REVENUE) KAMRUP (METRO) GUWAHATI DISTRICT- KAMRUP (METRO) ASSAM 5:THE CIRCLE OFFICER DISPUR REVENUE CIRCLE DISTRICT KAMRUP (METRO) ASSA Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T HUSSAIN, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE Linked Case : WP(C)/7182/2023 BINU DAS W/O- BIPUL DAS R/O- SATGAON P.S.- NOONMATI GUWAHATI- 781071 DISTRICT- KAMRUP(M) ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI PIN CODE- 781006. 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006. 3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KAMRUP(M) GUWAHATI. 4:THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER (REVENUE) KAMRUP(M). 5:THE CIRCLE OFFICER DISPUR REVENUE CIRCLE KAMRUP(M) GUWAHATI. ------------ Page No.# 3/3 Advocate for : MR. I CHOUDHURY Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER 01.12.2025 None appears for the petitioners on call. 2. By the last order passed in WP(C) No. 587/2024, it was observed that none had appeared for the petitioners on call and the stand of the respondents that an annual patta of the land stands in the name of some other person or some person other than the petitioners was also recorded. 3. Today also, none appears on call and the records reveal that the affidavit-in- opposition filed by the respondent No. 5, was also received by the petitioners, who have not responded to the same by filing any affidavit-in-reply. 4. In view of the above, these present writ petitions are closed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant