Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24667 (ALL)

PREMVEER SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/425/2025 · 2025-03-06

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:33246 Court No. - 82 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 425 of 2025 Applicant :- Premveer Singh And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ragini Gupta,Rohan Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Misc. Case No.21593 of 2020, arising out of case crime no. 672 of 2019, under Section 354, 323, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Sihani Gate, District-Ghaziabad pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.3, Ghaziabad expeditiously within stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the accused in the said case and after framing of the charge in this matter on 8.8.2024 the case is pending at the stage of evidence. It is also submitted that the opposite party no.2 is not cooperating with the Court concerned and is adopting delaying tactics in disposal of the said case and only dates are being fixed in the matter. The Court concerned is not taking proper interest in disposal of the said session trial. 4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to invoke the powers given to it under the CrPC to ensure the presence of the accused by sending appropriate process within three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it and thereafter all endeavours shall be made by it for expeditious disposal of the case, if there is no legal impediment. It is further directed that no unnecessary adjournment will be sought/granted. 7. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 7.3.2025 Fhd Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad