Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24666 (BOM)

RAHUL GOVIND SHELKE AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

WP/1496/2024 · 2025-02-21

Shri Ravindra V Ghuge, Shri Sandipkumar C More

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 911 wp 1496-24.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 911 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1496 OF 2024 RAHUL GOVIND SHELKE AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER … Mr. Pathan Sartaj Khan H., Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, APP for Respondent-State … CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ. DATED : 21/02/2025. ... PER COURT : 1. The Petitioner claims to be the custodian of the Close Circuit TV recording. According to him, he had presented the CCTV footage to the investigating officer. However, it is not a part of the charge sheet in RCC No.296 of 2023, before the learned Judicial Magistrate (First Class), at Ambajogai. According to him, he has moved an Application Exhibit-31/D praying for orders and directions to the investigating officer to produce the piece of evidence. The said Application is said to be pending. 2025:BHC-AUG:5785-DB 2 911 wp 1496-24.odt 2. In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off. We expect the learned Court dealing with RCC No.296 of 2023, to decide Application Exhibit-31/D expeditiously, if not already decided, on its own merit. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) VS Maind/-