[2025:RJ-JP:30812] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9179/2025 Pradeep @ Peeyush S/o Hemant Saini, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Balluwada At Present BMG Alligate City Rewari Police Station Modal Town, Rewari District Rewari (Haryana) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9786/2025 Deepanshu S/o Vedprakash, Aged About 23 Years, R/o House No. 484/99, Ward No. 4, Mata Masani Chowk, Bagdiyan Mohalla, Mahendragarh, Thana City Mahendragarh, District Mahendragarh (Hariyana). (At Present Confine In Sub Jail Kishangarh Bass) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Chechi, Adv., for Mr. Manjeet Kumar, Adv., and Mr. Vineet Dixit, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 08/08/2025 1. These bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.52/2025 registered at Police Station Kotkasim, District Khairthal-Tijara for the offences punishable under Section 125 of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3/25 & 5/27 of [2025:RJ-JP:30812] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9179/2025] Arms Act. After completion of investigation, police filed charge- sheet in this matter. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submit that it is a case of no injury and there is allegation of air fire against the petitioners. They argue that charge- sheet has already been filed and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. They contend that the petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and submits that one criminal case under the Arms Act has been registered against the petitioner-Deepanshu S/o Vedprakash. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, especially the fact that it is a case of no injury and there is allegation of air fire against the petitioners; charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – 1. Pradeep @ Peeyush S/o Hemant Saini and 2. Deepanshu S/o Vedprakash shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond [2025:RJ-JP:30812] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9179/2025] in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of these instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/S-411-412