[2025:RJ-JP:27310] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10670/2025 Premier Printing Press, A Proprietorship Concern Having Its Registered Address At 12 Ramnagar, Sodala, Jaipur (Raj.) Through Its Proprietor Shri Ram Swaroop Mor S/o Shri Shri G.l. Mor, Aged About 75 Years, R/o C 158, Bahubali Path, Shyam Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Information And Public. Relations, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur- 302 005. 2. The Executive Director (Finance), Rajasthan Samwad, Department Of Information And Public Relations, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. M/s Yashraj Advertisers, Through Its Proprietor Mr. Yogesh Kumar Sharma, Office Address- Plot No. 1, B1, Aanchal Apartment, Opposite State Bank Of India, Sehkar Marg, Lal Kothi, Jaipur- 302015. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Udit Sharma For Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : : Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG with Mr. Aaditya Godara Mr. Vedant Sharma Mr. Prateek Kasliwal through V.C. with Mr. Shubham Bhati HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 22/07/2025 Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG & Mr. Vedant Sharma, Adv. have put in appearance on behalf of respondents whereas Mr. Prateek Kasliwal, Adv. has put in appearance through V.C. as caveator. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not impleaded as party respondent in the second appeal filed by the respondent No.3 under the provisions of Rajasthan Transparency Public Procurement Act, 2012. [2025:RJ-JP:27310] (2 of 2) [CW-10670/2025] At the outset, learned counsel for the respondent No.3 submits that order passed by the learned Second Appellate Authority may be quashed and set aside and it may be allowed to implead the petitioner as party respondent and fresh order may be passed by the learned Second Appellate Authority. Counsel submits that Appellate Authority may be directed to expedite the hearing of the second appeal. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not object the submissions of counsel for the respondent No.3. In view of above, order dated 08.07.2025 passed by learned Second Appellate Authority is quashed and set aside on following term as agreed and requested by learned counsel for the respective parties:- “The Second Appellate Authority shall decide the appeal preferred by the respondent No.3 after impleading the petitioner as party respondent afresh after affording an opportunity of hearing to all the parties within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of this order.” Parties are directed to remain present before the Second Appellate Authority on 28.07.2025. With the aforesaid directions, this civil writ petition stands disposed of. Stay application and pending application(s) (if any) stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /74