YUSUF KHAN S/O MEHBULLA KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/9095/2025 · 2025-08-26
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24653 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24653 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:34033] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9095/2025 Yusuf Khan S/o Mehbulla Khan, R/o Purane Hospital Ke Peechhe, Gujjar Mohalla, Manoharthana District Jhalawar Hal Sayak Karamchari (Kaaryavaahak Safai Niraeekshak) Department Nagar Palika Chhabra District Baran Raj (Presently Confined In District Jail Baran) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aman Ali For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 26/08/2025
1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Yusuf Khan S/o Mehbulla Khan in FIR No. 160/2025 dated 21.06.2025 registered at P.S. C.P.S. Jaipur ACB District, whereby the applicant- accused was charged under Sections 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act.
2. The applicant was arrested and is in judicial custody since his arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application.
3.
Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner is working as a public servant in Municipality wherein complainant was a
[2025:RJ-JP:34033] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9095/2025] tanker supplier and having an animosity with present petitioner accused. He further submitted that no recovery is effected from the petitioner accused and it is not established that a bribe has been demanded by petitioner accused for work pending with present petitioner. He also submitted that charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 5. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 6. On the basis of complaint made by Deepak Dadani about demand of bribe by petitioner accused a trap is led after verification and after trap proceedings a FIR no. 160/2025 is registered by ACB. After investigation a charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner accused. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused
8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicants-accused Yusuf Khan S/o Mehbulla Khan, is hereby allowed and ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of
[2025:RJ-JP:34033] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9095/2025] like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 9.
The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /120