IN THE H 296 BALBIR AND A STATE OF HA CORAM: HON Present : Non Mr. Mr. ( Non MANISHA BAT The fact that the matt dates of hearing, It a present petition prosecution. 30.01.2025 Jyoti-IV HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M Date of de AND ANR. Versus F HARYANA AND ORS. HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANI None for the petitioners. Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, D.A.G., Haryana. Mr. M.K. Mittal, Advocate for respo Through V.C.) None for respondents No.11 to 14. **** A BATRA, J. (oral) There is no representation on behal e matter has been passed over twice. E aring, none had appeared on their beha It appears that the petitioners are etition any more. Hence, the same (M Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/N Whether reportable : Yes/N AB AND HARYANA RH M No.7685 of 2019 e of decision: 30.01.2025 …. Petitioners …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA ana. r respondents No.2 to 9. o 14. behalf of the petitioners despite the wice. Even on the last three effective ir behalf. rs are not interested to pursue the same is dismissed for want of (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE es/No. es/No e the ctive the t of Jyoti 2025.01.31 14:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order Chandigarh