- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25481 RSA No. 1151 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1151 OF 2021 (INJ) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. CHIKKAMMA W/O LATE SHANKAREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS 2. SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O PAPEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 3. SRI. MANJA @ MANJESHA S/O LATE SHANKAREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS 4. SRI. NAVEENA S/O LATE SHANKAREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS 5. SRI. NAGASANDRA S/O LATE SHANKAREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT GEJJALAGERE VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK-571125. 6. SRI. M.C. GURUMURTHY S/O LATE CHINNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS 7. SRI. MAHESHA S/O LATE SHANKAREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS APPELLANTS 1 TO 4, 6 AND 7 Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25481 RSA No. 1151 of 2021 ALL RESIDING AT MALLAGHATTA VILLAGE KEREGODU HOBLI MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA, PIN-571401. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. MANU N.P., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SMT. SUNANDA W/O VENKATAGIRI AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS 2. SMT. SHYLAJA W/O DEVARAJU AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS BOTH RESIDING AT MALLAGHATTA VILLAGE, KERAGODU HOBLI, MANDYA TALUK AND DISTRICT PIN-571401. 3. SRI. M.S. VENKATAGIRI S/O LATE SANNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT CHOKANAHALLI VILLAGE KEREGODU HOBLI MANDYA TALUK MANDYA, PIN-571401. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAJEEVA B.C., ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 3) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.01.2019 PASSED IN RA No.67/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MANDYA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.08.2018 PASSED IN OS.No.69/2013 - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25481 RSA No. 1151 of 2021 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, MANDYA PASSED IN O.S.No.69/2013. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants is absent. 2. This Court on the last occasion, made it clear that if the learned counsel for the appellants does not appear on the next date of hearing, the appeal would be dismissed. In spite of the said order, the appellant's counsel is absent today and there is no representation. 3. Hence, the appeal is dismissed, in view of the order dated 26.06.2025. 4. In view of dismissal of main appeal, I.A.No.2/2020 does not survive for consideration and the same stands disposed of. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47