Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2465 (AP)

VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT CRICKET ASSOCIATION v. VIZAG BLUES CRICKET CLUB

CRP/53/2025 · 2025-08-03

V Sujatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010002682025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 53/2025 Between: 1. VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT CRICKET ASSOCIATION, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 1ST FLOOR, YSR ACA STADIUM, PM PALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. VIZAG BLUES CRICKET CLUB, REP BY ITS PRESIDENT, P.V.RAMANA MURTHY, S/O LATE P.CHANDRAMANI, AGED 59 YEARS. 2. CRICKET CLUB OF VISAKHAPATNAM, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, Y.VENKATESH, OFFICE AT DOOR NO.57-28-16/1, BHAVANI GARDENS, OLD ITI JUNCTION, VISAKHAPATNAM -530007. 3. K VIJAY MOHAN, S/O K.GOPALA RAO, AGED 56 YEARS. DOOR NO.58-15-40, ROYAL TOWERS, SHANTI NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM 530009. 4. ANDHRA CRICKET ASSOCIATION, AFFILIATED TO BCCI, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, OFFICE AT DR.YSR ACA VDCA CRICKET STADIUM P.M.PALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM, AP, 530041. 5. DISTRICT REGISTRAR, , SOCIETIES REGISTRATION OFFICE, 6TH FLOOR, VUDA BUILDING, SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to the present Civil revision petition is preferred against the Order and decree in IA.No.361/2024 in OP.No.24/2023 dated 02.09.2024 on the file of the Learned Principal District Judge, Visakhapatnam, IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in SOP.No.24/2023 on the file of the Principal District Judge at Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the above revision petition, pending disposal of the above revision petition, and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BHARAT BABU.N Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SHAIK MEERAVALI 3 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 53/2025 ORDER: The present Civil revision petition is preferred against the Order and decree in IA.No.361 of 2024 in OP.No.24 of 2023 dated 02.09.2024 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Visakhapatnam. 2. It is brought to the notice of this Court by Ms. P.Sai Bharathi, learned counsel representing Sri N.Bharath Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the present petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the same, the present Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date : 04.08.2025. UPS 4 122 HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.53 of 2025 Date : 04.08.2025 UPS