- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5798 WP No. 15025 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 15025 OF 2020 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. LAKSHMI W/O B.PICHANDI, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.1A, 5TH BLOCK, JAIN SUNDERBAN, GURUSWAMY STREET, MOGAPPAIR WEST, CHENNAI - 600 095. 2. SRI P.VIJAYANANDA S/O LATE B.PICHANDI, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO.1A, 5TH BLOCK, JAIN SUNDERBAN, GURUSWAMY STREET, MOGAPPAIR WEST, CHENNAI - 600 095. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHOKKA REDDY., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. COMMISSIONER, BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, HUDSON CIRCLE, BANGALORE - 560 002. 2. CHAIRMAN, KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY, 2ND FLOOR, SILVER JUBLI BLOCK, UNITY BUILDING, CSI COMPOUND, 3RD CROSS, MISSION ROAD, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5798 WP No. 15025 of 2020 BENGALURU, KARNATAKA - 560 027. 3. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, DEPARTMENT OF SURVEY, SETTLEMENT AND LAND RECORDS, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, K.R.CIRCLE, BANGALORE - 560 001. 4. M/S. V.VENTURA A PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.332, 28TH MAIN, 38TH CROSS, EAST END MAIN ROAD, 9TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 069. REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR. MR. SHANTH KUMAR.S. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. AMITH DESHPANDE., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. RAJASHEKHAR.K., ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA FOR R3; SRI. B.S.SUDHINDRA., ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioners are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen form the daily order sheet, petition was listed on 06.02.2025, on that day, when the matter is called, - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:5798 WP No. 15025 of 2020 there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioners, the petition was ordered to be listed on 10.02.2025. The petition is listed today for appearance of counsel for the petitioners. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioners are not represented. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 43