Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010033492024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/86/2024 DIBYAJYOTI BORAH AND 6 ORS SON OF LATE UPEN BORAH, RESIDENT OF CHARIGAON BHARALI CHUCK, DIST.- JORHAT, ASSAM, PIN- 785010 2: HEMEN KAKATI SON OF LATE HARI CHARAN KAKATI RESIDENT OF VILL. JANIA DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN- 781314 3: BABUL KURMI SON OF RAGHUNATH KURMI RESIDENT OF VILL. TIPOMIA NATUN MATI DIST. JORHAT ASSAM PIN- 785630 4: RAJENDRA SINGHA SON OF LATE RABINDRA SINGHA RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 69 UDAY NAGAR KAINADHARA KHANAPARA DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN- 781022 5: MIRAJUL HOQUE CHOUDHURY SON OF LATE SAMSUL HOQUE RESIDENT OF VILL. LACHIT ROAD HOWLY DIST. BARPETA ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 PIN- 781316 6: NAYANMANI DAS SON OF LATE HARAKANTA DAS RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 13 WARD NO. 12 FATASHIL (KAILASHPUR) DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN- 781009 7: MRINAL KUMAR BORAH SON OF LATE MONI RAM BORAH RESIDENT OF VILL. CHAKARIGAON DIST. NAGAON ASSAM PIN- 78200 VERSUS ARUNA RAJORIA COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST DEPARTMENT, JANATA BHAWAN, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006 2:SRI MAHENDRA KUMAR YADAVA IFS THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST AND HEAD OF FOREST FORCE (PCCF AND HOFF) ASSAM ARANYA BHAWAN PANJABARI GUWAHATI- 78103 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M P SARMA, MR. S BANIK,MS F BEGUM,MR A CHAKRABORTY,MS N NEWME Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 08.12 .2025 Mr. S. Banik, learned counsel for the petitioners on instructions submits that pursuant to the directions containing in the order dated 27.11.2024 passed in Writ Appeal No.121/2024, the grievance of the petitioner stood ameliorated and the directions of the learned Single Judge has been sustained and also complied with by the respondents. He therefore, submits that this contempt case may be closed. The notices in the matter have not been issued. Taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court finds it appropriate to close the matter at this stage without issuing notice. Accordingly, this matter stands closed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant