Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2464 (PNJ)

KRISHAN KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/46059/2025 · 2026-02-11

Surya Partap Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-46059 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 128 KRISHAN KUMAR STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. petitioner. on 18.11.2025 and 16.12.2025 apparent that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present petition. 46059-2025 (O&M)7 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH KRISHAN KUMAR VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA P None for the petitioner. **** SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. (Oral): Despite repeated calls nobody has appeared on behalf of petitioner. Waited sufficiently. A perusal of record shows that o 18.11.2025 and 16.12.2025, the petitioner was unrepresented. It that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present petition. Accordingly, the present petition is Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-46059-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 11.02.2026 .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS .....RESPONDENT(S) SURYA PARTAP SINGH Despite repeated calls nobody has appeared on behalf of A perusal of record shows that on last two occasions also, , the petitioner was unrepresented. It that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present petition. t petition is hereby dismissed in default. Yes/No Yes/No (O&M) .02.2026 (S) (S) Despite repeated calls nobody has appeared on behalf of i.e. , the petitioner was unrepresented. It is that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present petition. dismissed in default. VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.02.12 18:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document