RAMIZ UDDIN LASKAR v. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND 2 ORS
WP(C)/6101/2025 · 2025-10-30
Manish Choudhury
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24635 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24635 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010217562025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6101/2025 RAMIZ UDDIN LASKAR C/O- ABDUL TAHIR LASKAR, RESIDENT OF DAKSHIN KRISHNAPUR, SONABARIGHAT PT-I, CACHAR, ASSAM-788013. VERSUS PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND 2 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGER, PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, SILCHAR BRANCH, CENTRAL ROAD, SILCHAR-788001, FORMERLY UNITED BANK OF INDIA.
2:STATE BANK OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF MANAGER SOUTH GUWAHATI BRANCH ULUBARI G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI.
3:STATE BANK OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA NEW SILCHAR BRANCH HAILAKANDI ROAD NS AVENUE CACHAR ASSAM-788005 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J LASKAR, Advocate for the Respondent : SC, PNB,
Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
ORDER Date : 31-10-2025 Mr. J. Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A. Parvez, learned Standing Counsel, PNB are present. Mr. Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that certain
facts which are omitted, are required to be incorporated in the writ petition. He has, therefore, prayed to allow him to withdraw the writ petition, with the liberty, to file afresh. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant