Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15135 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Nawada ======================================================
1. Anil Singh Son Of Late Maheshwar Singh Village- Bhelu Bigaha Ward No 13, Ps- Hisua District -nawada
2. Chappu Singh @ Chandrama Singh Son Of Ramanuj Singh Village- Bhelu Bigaha Ward No 13, Ps- Hisua District -nawada
3. Mahesh Singh Son Of Late Bhagirath Singh Village- Bhelu Bigaha Ward No 13, Ps- Hisua District -nawada ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Tejpratap Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rajendra Prasad Nat, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 28-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Nawada Excise P.S. Case No. 59/2025 (PTN-253/2025) dated 27.01.2025 registered for the offence punishable u/s 20(a), 44 and 46 of the N.D.P.S Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, 5.870 kgs ganja plant including sack of 500 grams was recovered behind the house of the petitioner no. 1. Further, 4.605 kgs. ganja plant including sack of 500 grams was recovered from the possession of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15135 of 2025(2) dt.28-03-2025 2/3 petitioner no. 2 and 4.630 kgs. ganja plant including sack of 500 grams was recovered from the possession of the petitioner no. 3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The seized contraband is less than commercial quantity. The petitioners have no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioners have clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 28.01.2025
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioners by submitting that the petitioners have no valid authorization for keeping the said contraband. 6.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioners above-named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Nawada, in connection with Nawada Excise P.S. Case No. 59/2025 (PTN-253/2025), with the condition:- (i). The petitioners are directed to remain physically
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15135 of 2025(2) dt.28-03-2025 3/3 present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bonds of the petitioners are liable to be cancelled. 7. The application stands allowed. atul/- (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) U T