APHC010348672025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17492/2025 Between: 1. MATTA RUSHI MEENAKSHI, C/o.VEERA SATHISH, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.13-2-17KV, JAGGAYYA CHERUVU, NEAR RAMALAYAM, PITHAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA DISTRICT AT KAKINADA, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GOLLAPROLU POLICE STATION, GOLLAPROLU, KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. ANNAVARAM CHINNAM, S/O.NAGESWARA RAO, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O. CHEBROLU VILLAGE, GOLLAPROLU MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in including the petitioner as Accused No.3 on the confession of the accused in the crime in FIR No.107 of 2024 dated 12.04.2024 registered under Sections 417 and 420 IPC on the file of the 3rd respondent police station without application of executive mind as well as without conducting any preliminary enquiry as required under criminal law as illegal, arbitrary and also abuse of power of police besides oppose to all cannons of justice consequentially direct the respondent No. 3 not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner with regard to and in connection with FIR No.107 of 2024 dated 12.04.2024 registered under Sections 417 and 420 IPC on the file of the 3rd respondent police station Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V SAI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ ... to issue a Writ or Order Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in including the petitioner as Accused No.3 on the confession of the accused in the crime in FIR No.107 of 2024 dated 12.04.2024 registered under Sections 417 and 420 IPC on the file of the 3rd respondent police station without application of executive mind as well as without conducting any preliminary enquiry as required under criminal law as illegal, arbitrary and also abuse of power of police besides oppose to all cannons of justice consequentially direct the respondent No. 3 not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner with regard to and in connection with FIR No.107 of 2024 dated 12.04.2024 registered under Sections 417 and 420 IPC on the file of the 3rd respondent police station ....” 2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that anticipatory bail was granted to the Petitioner by this Court and that the subject of this Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and that this Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents/Police is in attendance. 4. In that view, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 17492 of 2025 29.07.2025 Mjl /*