MUKESH KUMAR SHARMA S/O SHRI BABULAL SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
HC/6/2025 · 2025-01-13
Pankaj Bhandari, Shubha Mehta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2463 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2463 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:1770-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 6/2025 Mukesh Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Babulal Sharma, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Indokiya, Post Bhambhori, Kalwar, Jhotwara, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Home, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur (Raj.).
3. S.h.o Police Station Kalwar, District Jaipur (Raj.).
4. Suja Ram Jat S/o Shri Mewa Ram, R/o House No. 67, Govind Vihar, Behind Khandaka Hospital, Hathoj, Kalwar Road, Jaipur - 302012 (Raj.).
5. Harendra @ Mukesh Jitarwal S/o Suja Ram Jat, R/o House No. 67, Govind Vihar, Behind Khandaka Hospital, Hathoj, Kalwar Road, Jaipur - 302012 (Raj.).
6. Amar Chand S/o Shri Mewa Ram, R/o Near S.k. Flower Car Decor, Sambhar Chauraha, Nawa City, District Didwana Kuchaman (Raj.).
7. Prem Prakash S/o Amar Chand, R/o Near S.k. Flower Car Decor, Sambhar Chauraha, Nawa City, District Didwana Kuchaman (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Rahar For State : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Aman Kumar, AAAG Mr. Vivek Sharma Addl. G.A. Mr. Ratan Singh (S.I.), SHO Police Station Kalwar, District Jaipur, Present in Person HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 13/01/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:1770-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-6/2025]
1. Petitioner has filed this habeas corpus petition seeking production of the corpus, who happens to be wife of the petitioner.
2. Mr. Ratan Singh (S.I.), SHO Police Station Kalwar, District Jaipur is present before the Court and submitted the status report. As per the report submitted, corpus was recovered on 08.01.2025 and after counseling between both the sides and ascertaining the wish of the corpus, she was allowed to go with the petitioner.
3. Today, corpus has appeared with petitioner before the Court.
4. It is stated by counsel that corpus has threat from her family members.
5. Since corpus is no longer in illegal custody and before the Court she has expressed her wish to stay with the petitioner, the present habeas corpus petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents-State to ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioner and corpus.
6. Corpus is free to go to the place of her choice.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J (PANKAJ BHANDARI),J MAHIMA/86