Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24627 (KAR)

MR HANUME GOWDA v. M/S BANGALORE CITY CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD

WP/13965/2021 · 2025-01-09

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:819 WP No. 13965 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 13965 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MR. HANUMEGOWDA S/O BASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.708, BEHIND POLICE STATION, BIDADI, RAMANAGARA-562 109. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. KAVITHA.D., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. M/S. BANGALORE CITY CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR AUTHORIZED OFFICER, OFFICE AT NO.3, PAMPAMAHAKAVI ROAD, CHAMARAJPET, BANGALORE-560 018. 2. M/S. BANGALORE CITY CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., CHAIRMAN, 3. M/S. BANGALORE CITY CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., GENERAL MANAGER, ALL RESIDING OFFICE AT: OFFICE/AT: 3 PAMPAMAHAKAVI ROAD, CHAMARAJPET, BANGALORE-560 018. 4. REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, O/AT: ALI ASKER ROAD, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:819 WP No. 13965 of 2021 NEAR RAJ BHAVAN, VASANTH NAGAR, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA-560 052. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 08.01.2025, on that day, when the matter is called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioner it was ordered to be listed on 09.01.2025. The petition is listed today for appearance of counsel of the petitioner. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:819 WP No. 13965 of 2021 is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6