Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24618 (AP)

The Narasannapeta Gram Panchayat, v. The Assistant Accounts Officer,

WP/28218/2013 · 2025-07-02

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010348462013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 28218/2013 Between: 1. THE NARASANNAPETA GRAM PANCHAYAT,, REP.BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER V.PRAKASA RAO, NARASANNAPETA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE ASSISTANT ACCOUNTS OFFICER, ELECTRICITY REVENUE OFFICE, APEPDCL TEKKALI, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF AP LIMITED, OPERATION CIRCLE, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE GOVERNMENT OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHATYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT (PTS.IV) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 4. THE EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD REP BY ITS, CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM R4 IS IMPLEADED AS PER C.O. DT. 3-10-13 IN WPMP 35412 OF 13 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the 1st respondent in issuing the impugned Lr.No.AAO/ERO/ /Billing/JAO/ D.No.371/13, dated 10-07-2013 as 2 highly illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the G.O.Rt.No.80, dated 17-01-2009 and consequential G.O.Rt.No.1190, dated 18-07-2013 and consequentially this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to set aside the impugned order dated 10- 07-2013 IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WVMP 3554 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed on dated 03-10-2013 in W.P.M.P.No.35019 of 2013 in W.P.No.28218 of 2013 IA NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP 35019 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned Lr. No.AAO/ERO/ /Billing/JAO/D.No.371/13, dated 10- 07-2013 issued by the 1st respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 3 OF 2013(WPMP 35412 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the proposed respondent No. 4 as party respondent to the present WP No. 28218/2013 as well as in WPMP No. 35018/2013 as necessary party in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M R TAGORE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 3. M RAVINDRA (SC FOR APEPDCL) The Court made the following order: Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive and hence, the same is now rendered infructuous. 3 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous petitions shall stand closed. ______________________ SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J Dated: 03.07.2025 SNI 4 113 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.28218 of 2013 Dated: 03.07.2025 SNI