Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24618 (ALL)

PREMVEER SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/379/2025 · 2025-03-03

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:30596 Court No. - 82 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 379 of 2025 Applicant :- Premveer Singh And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ragini Gupta,Rohan Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to expedite the proceedings of Misc. Case No. 4352 of 2018 arising out of case crime no. 139 of 2018, under Sections 182, 193, 420, 403, 411, 120B IPC, Police Station Sihani Gate, District- Ghaziabad pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.3, Ghaziabad expeditiously within stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the accused in the said case. Charges have been framed, however, no witness has been recorded so far. The Court concerned is not taking proper interest in disposal of the said session trial. 4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. It reveals from the perusal of the order sheets that charge sheet in this matter was submitted on 1.4.2018. The Court took some time to procure the appearance of the accused and charges were framed and since then the case is pending at the stage of evidence but no evidence is being adduced by the prosecution. 7. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to invoke the powers given to it under the CrPC to ensure the presence of the accused by sending appropriate process within three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it and thereafter all endeavours shall be made by it for expeditious disposal of the case within two years, if there is no legal impediment. It is further directed that no unnecessary adjournment will be sought/granted. 8. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 9. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 4.3.2025 Fhd Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad