CENTRAL COALFIELDS LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR v. RAM KUMAR BANSAL
LPA/503/2024 · 2025-01-23
Deepak Roshan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24616 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24616 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
L.P.A. No. 503 of 2024
1. Central Coalfields Limited, a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, having its registered Office at Darbhanga House, PO G.P.O, PS Kotwali, District Ranchi (Jharkhand), through its Chairman- cum-Managing Director, having office at Darbhanga House, PO : G.P.O. and PS - Kotwali, District Ranchi (Jharkhand) and also through its H.O.D. (Legal) Sri Jobe V.P., aged about 53 years, S/o. Late V.V. Philip, residing at 396/B, Road No.4-C, Ashok Nagar, PO Doranda, PS- Argora, District : Ranchi (Jharkhand), who is also representing the other appellants herein.
2. General Manager (Personnel/Land-Revenue), Central Coalfields Limited, Magadh Amrapali Area, District Office, P.O. & P.S. Tandwa, District Chatra, Jharkhand
... ... ... Appellants
Versus
1. Ram Kumar Bansal, aged about 56 years, S/o, Ram Chandra Agarwal, R/O 78, Mandir Tola, Village Gagi, Bundu, P.O. & P.S. Petarwar, District Bokaro, Jharkhand
2. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Registration and Land Reforms, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, PO & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand
3. The Deputy Commissioner, P.O, P.S & District Chatra, Jharkhand.
4. The Circle Officer, Tandwa, P.O & P.S Tandwa, District Chatra, Jharkhand
… … ... Respondents
--------- CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Appellants: Mr. A.K. Das, Advocate For the Res- 1: Mr. Chiranjeev Bhadoria, Advocate For the State: Mr. Amrit Raj Kisku, AC to GA-V
--------- 03/Dated: 23.01.2025 I.A. No. 10662 of 2024 1) This application is filed to condone the delay of 41 days in filing this appeal challenging the judgment of the learned single Judge. 2) Mr. Chiranjeev Bhadoria, counsel appearing for 1st respondent and Mr. Amrit Raj Kisku, AC to learned GA-V for the other
-2- respondents state that they have no objection to the condonation of the period of delay. 3) Therefore, the application is allowed and delay in filing this appeal is condoned. L.P.A. No. 503 of 2024 4) Counsel for the appellants seeks to withdraw the letters patent appeal. 5) He is permitted to do so. 6) This letters patent appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(M.S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.)
(Deepak Roshan, J.) Sharda/MM/ Cp.02