1 2025:CGHC:48837 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4731 of 2023 1 - Suresh Kumar Nand S/o Mahettar Lal Nand Aged About 47 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B) At Government Primary School, Kolihadeori, Blcok Basna District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. 2 - Roopesh Kumar Nishad S/o Khorbahra Ram Nishad Aged About 35 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B) At Government Primary School, Kamrinmuda, Block Magarlod, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary School Education Department, Mananadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction 1st Floor Block-3, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Divisional Joint Director, Education Division Raipur Chhattigarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harshmandar Rastogi, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajay Pandey, Government Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad) ABHIGYA SAXENA Digitally signed by ABHIGYA SAXENA 2 Order on Board 23.09.2025 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition may be disposed of permitting the petitioner to make a detailed representation to respondent/competent authority for the grievances projected in the writ petition, respondent/competent authority may be directed to consider and decide the same within the reasonable period of time in accordance with the relevant rules and law applicable to the case of petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that he is having no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 4. Be that as it may, after considering the submissions made by the both the parties at bar and on perusal of the documents available on record, this petition is disposed of, at this stage, permitting the petitioner to make a detailed representation before the respondent /competent authority projecting all his grievances as projected in this writ petition along with the copy of petition within 30 days from today and in turn respondent/competent authority is expected to consider and decide the same within the period of 120 days from submission of such representation in accordance with the relevant rules and law applicable to the case of petitioner. 5. If any adverse order is passed against the petitioner, he may avail 3 the remedy available under the law. 6. This Court does not express anything on the merits of this case. 7. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions. Certified Copy as per rules. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JUDGE Saxena