[2025:RJ-JP:7401] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 159/2025 Kalu Ram S/o Ramswaroop, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Thali, Police Station Chaksu, District Tonk (Raj.) (At Present In District Jail Tonk). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Prasad Sharma Mr. Lakhan Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 19/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.499/2024 registered at Police Station Baroni, District Tonk (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 331(6), 74, 115(2), 351(3) & 109(1) of BNS & Section 4/25 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR. Counsel submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner to cause any injury to injured. Counsel submits that only two grievous injuries have been found in this matter and same are not attributed to the petitioner. Counsel submits that there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 16.12.2024 and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:7401] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-159/2025] 3. Learned Public opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that petitioner is not named in the FIR; material available on record in the form of case diary; role attributed to the petitioner; absence of criminal antecedents of the petitioner; period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner -Kalu Ram S/o Ramswaroop shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN), J LALIT MOHAN /107