FRANCIS AUGUSTINE v. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DIVISION 103
WP/6151/2025 · 2025-02-21
K Rajasekar, S M Subramaniam
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24596 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24596 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:MHC:776 WP No. 6151 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21-02-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR WP No. 6151 of 2025
1. Mr.Francis Augustine Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The Executive Engineer, Division 103 Corporation Of Chennai, Zone-VIII, No.36B, 2nd Cross Street, Pulla Avenue, Shenoy Nagar, Chennai 600 030 2.The Assistant Engineer, Division 103, Corporation Of Chennai, No.36B, 2nd Cross Street, Pulla Avenue, Shenoy Nagar, Chennai 600 030 Respondent(s) WP No. 6151 of 2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 6151 of 2025 PRAYER Directing the respondents to remove the Lock and Seal affixed by the respondents on the premises at Door No.AG-9, Old No.2B, Shanthi Colony, 4th Avenue, Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040 belonging to the petitioner. WP No. 6151 of 2025 For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.C.Selvasekaran For Respondent(s): Mrs.K.Aswini Devi Standing Counsel For GCC
ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter for a considerable length of time made a submission that the petitioner will abide by the order of the Government dated 22.08.2023 passed under Section 80A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.
2. The three-months time granted by the Government had expired long ago. Despite the lapse of over one and half years, the petitioner had not carried out the directions issued by the Government. Consequenlty, the authorities are
directed to ensure that the order of the Government is implemented within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 6151 of 2025 event of failure on the part of the petitioner in complying with the Government.
3. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner has chosen to withdraw the writ petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
(S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.)(K.RAJASEKAR J.) 21-02-2025 Jeni Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The Executive Engineer, Division 103 Corporation Of Chennai Zone VIII, No.36B, 2nd Cross Street, Pulla Avenue, Shenoy Nagar, Chennai 600 030 2.The Assistant Engineer, Division 103, Corporation Of Chennai No.36B, 2nd Cross Street, Pulla Avenue, Shenoy Nagar, Chennai 600 030 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 6151 of 2025 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND K.RAJASEKAR J. Jeni WP No. 6151 of 2025
21-02-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis