[2025:RJ-JP:27100] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10802/2025 Menaka Dusaad W/o Shri Mohan Jat, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Gram Panchayat Nangal Bharda, Panchayat Samiti Govindgarh, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur (Ex. Sarpanch Of Gram Panchayat Nangal Bharda) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Jaipur. 2. Zila Parishad, Chief Executive Officer, District Jaipur. 3. Development Officer, Govindgarh, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Pratap Singh For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 21/07/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned recovery orders dated 02.01.2025 and 16.04.2025 passed by the respondents against the petitioner. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that before passing the aforesaid impugned orders, neither any notice nor any opportunity of hearing was provided to the petitioner and straightaway the orders impugned have been passed against her in violation of the principles of natural justice, hence under these circumstances, interference of this Court is warranted. 3. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. [2025:RJ-JP:27100] (2 of 2) [CW-10802/2025] 4. Perusal of the impugned orders indicate that certain inquiry was conducted, but opportunity of hearing was not provided to the petitioner and straightaway the orders impugned have been passed resulting in violation of the principles of natural justice. 5. Considering the above, the present writ petition stands disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the authorities concerned by way of filing a representation. In case, any representation is submitted by the petitioner within a period of one week from today, it is expected from the authority concerned to hear and decide the same on its merits, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three weeks thereafter. 6. For a period of five weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. 7. It goes without saying that in case, any adverse order is passed against the petitioner, she would be at liberty to approach the appropriate forum of law for redressal of her grievance. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/35